Although patients are more engaged in their sleep health than ever before and demand for care is climbing steadily, running a sleep services program isn't a guaranteed win for hospitals. When planners are developing their sleep center's strategic plan, they should be aware of the three key forces affecting the sleep health market—and the strategies needed to adapt accordingly.
Your guide to the common obstacles faced when developing a sleep center
Key market forces include:
The volume of sleep studies is expected to grow rapidly across the next five years, but HST (a type of polysomnography test used to diagnose sleep disorders) is particularly popular. In 2014, a study on Medicare beneficiaries showed that HSTs comprised 12% of all polysomnography tests. In 2016, results from a sleep center survey showed HSTs made up 20% of all-payer volumes. This growing proportion of HSTs is largely attributable to increased awareness of sleep health, which has spurred patient engagement in sleep diagnostics and treatment. In addition, technological advancements and regulatory pressures encourage providers to prescribe HST instead of in-lab polysomnography.
In-lab sleep studies can be performed in the hospital outpatient department (HOPD) or a freestanding center, but right now—and across the next five years—volumes are only growing in the freestanding setting.
This difference largely stems from patient preferences. Patients value highly convenient, low-cost care. Freestanding sleep labs are typically located in the community where they are easily accessible. In addition, according to Anthem officials in 2013, an in-lab polysomnography done in a freestanding center costs just $600—as opposed to $1,300 in the HOPD. HSTs are even cheaper, at about $300. For price-sensitive patients, freestanding or at-home sleep tests are often the clear choice.
As the volume of sleep studies grows, sleep centers bring in more revenue. Interestingly, however, some centers are struggling financially, leading to closures and consolidation.
Regulations, which impose high administrative costs, as well as low reimbursement for HST, are the primary contributors to this phenomenon. In fact, a 2015 economic analysis evaluating seven sleep centers accredited as Centers of Excellence found that providers were losing money on HSTs. Meanwhile, the CEO of the International Institute of Sleep reports that the fee schedule for all sleep studies has decreased by 45% from 2009 to 2017.
Considering these trends, there are a few strategies organizations can use to prime their program for long-term success. For example, providers should:
Create your free account to access 1 resource, including the latest research and webinars.
You have 1 free members-only resource remaining this month.
1 free members-only resources remaining
1 free members-only resources remaining
You've reached your limit of free insights
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
You've reached your limit of free insights
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
This content is available through your Curated Research partnership with Advisory Board. Click on ‘view this resource’ to read the full piece.
Email ask@advisory.com to learn more.
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
This is for members only. Learn more.
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.